Home  •   Forums  •  FAQ  •  Search  •  Register  •  Profile  •  Log in to check your private messages  •  Log in
Free RSS Feeds    •  Tell your friends about our website!
 
 


 


 

 **CANADIAN P.I E MAIL'D ME EXCELLENT WISDOM/ADVICE! REPOST*

Post new topicReply to topic
Author Message
lawmanconfidential
The Next Sherlock Holmes


Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 625
Location: USA
21486 Reward Points

PostPosted: Sun Jun 08, 2008 10:19 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

NOTE I AM REPOSTING THIS INFORMATION AGAIN FOR EVERY ONE AS SOME OF THE SAME LAWS APPLY HERE IN THE U.S! AS WELL

THE FOLLOWING IS AN E MAIL I RECEIVED FROM THE CHIEF DETECTIVE OF CANADIAN INTERNAL AFFAIRS , IN RESPONSE FROM A REQUEST I MADE ON BEHALF OF THE FORUM!! REGARDING THE AMBIGUOUS INTELLIGENCE & INFORMATION PROCUREMENT METHODS BETWEEN US & OUR NORTHERN PALS!!*** ALL OF YOU CANADIAN READERS PLEASE TAKE NOTE!!**

Hello Mr. LXXIX


I appreciate you contacting Internal Affairs and your interest in perusing some of our website.



The frustration you and others attempting to conduct investigations in Canada is very real and widespread.



Basically, the forces of political correctness and privacy protection have hijacked the investigative process and information critical to the conduct of enquiries is simply not lawfully available, except to some limited extent, at great and unjustifiable cost. This is particularly so in Canada where virtually nothing of practical interest exists or is accessible in a public record.



In essence, apart from information that is already in the public domain, either through voluntary disclosure in advertising, on websites, in telephone directories or other media, virtually all information in government or corporate files is strictly confidential and can be obtained essentially in only two (lawful) ways: by Consent of the individual or entity to whom or with whom the record relates or is held or by means of a Court Order.



Of course, there is a third way of obtaining non-public information and that is through a confidential source or sources who have access to the sought after information, but obtaining information in this way is at the very least problematic and may involve the commission of criminal and other offences in Canada and elsewhere which, of course, creates legal risks for both the party who obtains and provides the information as well as those such as private investigators and their clients who may use or wish to disclose the information for the purpose of litigation or otherwise. In the absence of information provided by confidential sources, it is clear that, in theory and in fact, the ability of a private investigator to operate successfully and obtain positive results is severely limited.



In my humble opinion, privacy and related legislation has gone much too far and now virtually prevents individuals and corporations from conducting appropriate and necessary due diligence enquiries while at the same time frustrating both civil and criminal investigations alike with the result that the real beneficiaries of this type of myopic – and perhaps deliberately designed law – are criminals of all kinds, including corrupt politicians, embezzlers, money launderers, members of organized criminal enterprises, fraudsters, and thieves of all kinds, both of the corporate and personal variety, whether they be accountants who divert monies form their employers or spouses who divert matrimonial assets to hidden and/or off-shore accountants. Sophisticated criminals who obtain, divert and hide millions of dollars from their illicit activity have little fear of being caught particularly in our increasingly technological environment where dummy corporations and hidden financial accounts can be opened in scores of offshore, tax-free havens by professional asset managers protected by the virtually impenetrable veil of secrecy created by banking legislation and financial corporate policy.



We live in a world where it is both easy and acceptable to investigate, arrest and prosecute a $5.00 shoplifter while it is virtually impossible to investigate, arrest and prosecute a corporate thief or corrupt politician who obtains a ‘kick-back’ or embezzles or otherwise steals $5,000,000.00 from a corporation, business partner or spouse, particularly where cases involve multiple local or international jurisdictions.



It is all too convenient when information that is absolutely critical to the conduct of a civil or criminal investigation cannot be obtained because of ‘privacy’ considerations, when it is impossible to obtain Consent (from the uncooperative ‘person of interest’ or suspect) and it is equally impossible to obtain a Court Order because no one is in a position to advise the Court where – indeed in what country - or in what financial institution or other place the information or financial record that it is necessary to obtain may be found.



As far as my ‘Canadian Savvy’ is concerned, I would invite you to contact me directly at: 888-7XX XXX. As you know – or should know – our privacy interests in the United States, Canada and elsewhere have also been seriously eroded to the extent government and law enforcement have been given or assumed the ‘right’ to monitor e-mail and other communications for ostensibly legitimate as well as other arguably debatable reasons. It is simply unwise and foolhardy to retain let alone communicate anything of a sensitive personal or business nature in a file or via e-mail and/or attachments because the hard-drive or ‘brain’ of any computer simply contains and reflects the knowledge and thoughts of the person who uses or owns that computer and third-party monitoring or the deliberate ‘mirroring’ of a computer for criminal purposes or enforcement ‘fishing expeditions’ or investigations pose a very real threat except to the most innocuous users of this technology.



You may post this information for the benefit of other contributors to your Detective Forum if you wish.



Yours very truly,



Cullen Johnson,

President,

Internal Affairs,

6-489 Timothy Street,

New market, Ontario, Canada.

L3Y 6M7

Exclamation Idea LISTEN AND KEEP IN MIND! LAWMAN CONFIDENTIAL Wink
lawmanconfidential
The Next Sherlock Holmes


Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 625
Location: USA
21486 Reward Points

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 12:11 am Reply with quoteBack to top

EDITORIAL NOTE:
AGAIN TAKE HEAD TO THE WORDS OF A VERY "SAVVY" INTELLIGENT & WISE PROFESSIONAL DETECTIVE ..WHOM I WAS UNABLE TO FOLLOW UP WITH AT THE TIME AS I WAS BETWEEN A ROCK & A HARD PLACE PROFESSIONALLY,PERSONALLY & FINANCIALLY
SINCE THEN 21/2 THINGS HAVE CHANGED & I IN DEED (That' a word I don't use much!) plan to contact and re-establish a professional rapport & dialog hope fully help him with some of my /the resources available to me now! AGAIN MY SINCERE THANKS TO Cullen Johnson,

President,

Internal Affairs,

6-489 Timothy Street,

New market, Ontario, Canada.

* ALSO THIS IS NOT "MY SITE"
I JUST POST PERHAPS 20% OF MY PERSONAL
WEB LINKS AND CONTRIBUTE ABOUT 70%
OF MY TIME ON LINE TO TRY AND UTILIZE INFORMATION , EXPERIENCE , & EDUCATION I OBTAINED IN MY LIFE TIME : LAW ENFORCEMENT/CRIMINAL JUSTICE & PUBLIC SAFETY CAREER AND A NATURAL KNACK I HAVE FOR PROCURING,UTILIZING & DISSEMINATION FORENSIC INTELLIGENCE & INVESTIGATING ..BUT IT IS GETTING A LITTLE FRUSTRATING, MUCH LIKE BEING A BLIND MAN IN A ROUND ROOM ,WHO WAS TOLD TO FIND A CORNER TO PISS IN!
FOR LACK OF A BETTER ANALOGY !

AND I GOT SLAMMED, BEATEN TO THE PUNCH,SHOWED UP , WITH MY OWN ADVICE
BY A GIRL! LADY WOMAN , WE HAD TALKED AT LENGTH ABOUT OUR IQ SCORES & STUDIES & HIGH TEST SCORES IN READING/COGNITION (IN 4TH GRADE I BROKE AN OHIO STANDARDIZED SCHOOL RECORD BY READING AT COLG. LEVEL AND AGAIN AFTER 7 HOURS OF TESTING FOR ADMISSION TO A PRESTIGIOUS CATHOLIC COLLEGE PREP SCHOOL I SCORED IN THE TOP 1 . SOMETHING IN THE COUNTRY IN COMPREHENSION SO THEY SAY MAY MIND WORKS IS PENT FOR INVESTIGATING ...BUT THIS GIRL ,BEAT ME TO THE PUNCH! IN AN INVESTIGATION I WAS ASKED TO DO LAST WEEK BY A WOMAN FOR ONE OF HER EMPLOYEE'S BUT FROM HAVING BEEN BURNED BY SO MANY POZER LOW LIFE'S I REQUIRE AT LEAST A "TOKEN" DOWN PAYMENT OF 24.11 20-25$ WHAT EVER ,I AM EASY (IF I WAS A GIRL I WOULD BE A SLUT!) EASY LIKE SUNDAY MORNING! BUT I'LL BE DAMED IF I'LL LET SKELL'S TAKE MY KINDNESS FOE WEAKNESS!" NOT SATISFIED WITH THE LEAST EXPENSIVE INFO ON THE WEB ! POUND SAND OR GET BURNED BY ONE OF THOSE MISLEADING WEB P.I. DOWNLOADS!
ANY WAY THIS WOMAN AND I TALKED SO LONG MY CELL PHONE DIED THAT'S WHERE IT BECOMES A GREAT LESSON IN INVESTIGATION AND PRACTICING WHAT ONE PREACHES! WHICH I WILL POST IN THE NEXT DAY OR SO ALONG WITH A PROFESSIONAL LAW ENFORCEMENT ORGANIZATION I HAVE A MAJOR ROLL IN PART OF WHICH IS TO USE OUR INFLUENCE TO RID THE WEB OF THESE FAKE ,MISLEADING PHONY DETECTIVES/INVESTIGATIVE SITES AND PROVIDE "REAL HONEST PROFESSIONAL ADVICE HELP & GUIDENCE OR CLOSURE TO DECENT WORKING PEOPLE WHO CAN AFFORD HIGH PRICED CORPORATE INVESTIGATIVE OR B.S. INVESTIGATIVE THE LEAST! BUT EARNED & NEED IT THE MOST: THE NATIONAL COP CO-OPS INTELLIGENCE & INVESTIGATION NETWORK HAS JUST BEEN ESTABLISHED OF WHICH I HAVE AN EXECUTIVE POSITION ALONG WITH ACTIVE FBI & A FCOUPLE OTHER FED AGENTS, WE HAVE N,Y,P,D, ,MASS, SAN FRANSISCO & SAN DIAGO OFFICERS & DETECTIVES WISCONSON & FLA. DEPUTY SHERIFFS ETC SO HOPE FULLY A LOT OF YOUR COMPLAINTS AND MISS INFORMATION & DIRECTION WILL BE GONE! WELL THAT'S MY 2 CENTS AS MY SECRET MENTOR "WATCH MAN SAY'S AND AGAIN I THANK FROM THE BOTTOM OF MY HEART FOR HIS HELP SUPPORT & ENCOURAGEMENT IF YOU REALLY NEED HELP PLEASE WRITE ME AT delawman@gmail.com "WITH THE SPECIFICS" SO I KNOW RIGHT OFF THE BAT THE EXPENSE INVOLVED AND I"MAY" BE ABLE TO JUST SEND YOU A REPLY AT NO EXPENSE!" BUT REMEMBER AGAIN IT'S "LAWMAN" NOT "FIREMAN" AS IN I DON'T WANT SMOKE BLOWN UP MY booty! SO DON'T MAKE ME PUT MY BOOT UP YOURS! THANK YOU
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED
LAWMAN CONFIDENTIAL
delawman@gmail.com
jatabad
General Private Eye


Joined: 02 Jun 2008
Posts: 7
Location: Washington
93 Reward Points

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 4:46 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Hello Lawman,

We did have great conversation and in my efforts to find the information I was looking for, I am glad to report that I succeeded without the necessary expense because you helped me get thinking about creative methods and good old fashioned sense. Your knowledge and street sense are invaluable to those seeking your assistance and ya never know, they may just find a good friend too!

Much thanks to you,
Tronika
lawmanconfidential
The Next Sherlock Holmes


Joined: 29 Dec 2006
Posts: 625
Location: USA
21486 Reward Points

PostPosted: Mon Jun 09, 2008 8:26 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

THANKS TRONIKA YOU ARE SO INTELLIGENT & DEEP AND I HAVEN'T HAD A PHONE CONVERSATION AT SUCH LENGTH OR DEPTH SINCE , I CAN'T EVEN REMEMBER I MEAN I FELT AS IF WE COULD TALK TILL THE SUN CAME UP YOUR VERY CONSIDERATE & KIND BUT VERY PRAGMATIC I APPRECIATE HAVING YOU AS A FRIEND!

THIS IS THE WOMAN WHO BEAT ME AT MY OWN GAME!
Lwilliams
General Private Eye


Joined: 12 May 2008
Posts: 3

44 Reward Points

PostPosted: Wed Jun 11, 2008 6:29 pm Reply with quoteBack to top

Quote:
In essence, apart from information that is already in the public domain, either through voluntary disclosure in advertising, on websites, in telephone directories or other media, virtually all information in government or corporate files is strictly confidential and can be obtained essentially in only two (lawful) ways: by Consent of the individual or entity to whom or with whom the record relates or is held or by means of a Court Order.

Of course, there is a third way of obtaining non-public information and that is through a confidential source or sources who have access to the sought after information, but obtaining information in this way is at the very least problematic and may involve the commission of criminal and other offences in Canada and elsewhere which, of course, creates legal risks for both the party who obtains and provides the information as well as those such as private investigators and their clients who may use or wish to disclose the information for the purpose of litigation or otherwise. In the absence of information provided by confidential sources, it is clear that, in theory and in fact, the ability of a private investigator to operate successfully and obtain positive results is severely limited.


hello lawmanconfidential ... so a pi from Canada may be no help if the investigation is of someone in the US?
Display posts from previous:      
Post new topicReply to topic



 Digg!
  



2006 - DetectiveForums.com - ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
Powered by phpBB © 2001-2006  All times are GMT

 

LEGAL INFORMATION

Privacy Policy | Forum Terms of Use